Wednesday, April 17

Praeteritio

LOOK, first: would I be upset if the Boston bombings turn out to be the work of one of Roger Ailes' disgruntled minions, or some Sidewalk Second Amendment Expert, or the good Christians of Westboro? I'll be piling on, same as everybody. The major difference between my side and their side is that we didn't have anyone screaming Mooslems Mooslems Mooslems between the two blasts.

Well, that's one difference, anyway. Another is that the Right has to resurrect Bill Ayers to accuse the Left of domestic terrorism, while we need only harken back to the Murrah building. (Take a moment today to remember the nearly 900 victims of that one, including the 168 who never got out. I won't ask you to remember Bob Dole announcing immediately that the bombing had to be the work of "Arabs".  I won't mention which party resisted giving additional investigative powers to the FBI.)

We could (but won't) point out that interest in the Anthrax Attacks plummeted the minute it became obvious to everyone but Judith Miller that the source was domestic. Allah is Great! We could go further, if that was what we were up to, and point out that that's pretty much the direction of American law enforcement since the days when the Pinkertons were conducting it. Or point out that the US has been bombing women and children, on a regular basis and without a declaration of war, for seven decades now.

For that matter, someone in my little Midwestern burg might remember that two people died last year when the house next door exploded, in a plot to turn insurance payments into fucking Ferraris and fucking tokens for fucking slot machines.

I'm not gonna mention that any or all of that went through my head once the initial shock subsided.

I will tell you, though, that I examined all that in myself, and decided that none of it motivated me.

That is, that none of it motivates me to hope that Boston will be the lesson I'd hope it to be. Because I don't hope. It's senseless, stupid, ugly violence. It is, as Pierce says, a political act, and it has political ramifications we can't ignore. And like Zhou Enlai and the French Revolution, I guess someday we'll see. I'm glad for Patton Oswalt if he can find solace in human altruism. Humans are the only animals that will knowingly rush into a bombing site to help total strangers. They're also the only animal that needs to.

So lemme tell ya, for real: anyone who shed a tear for an eight-year-old boy who died waiting to see his Daddy finish a race should be reminded that eight-year-olds die all the time while we fucking dick around about gun violence. They should remember Fallujah, and the Christmas Bombings, and the torture that's been done in their names, right out in the open. Sorta. Not because they have any political axe to grind, but because senseless violence is senseless violence. And excusing any of it is a political act.

Me, I'll be satisfied if there's a closet in Hell somewhere where Chuck Todd gets to say "The President did not use the word 'Terrorism'" over and over, for Eternity, while he watches his paycheck shrink.

7 comments:

  1. Very nice, Doghouse.

    Have to admit, to my shame, is that an early thought is that the government would find a way to blame the Iranians* so that we would finally get the war they are all slobbering for. :(

    ReplyDelete
  2. R. Porrofatto11:55 AM EDT

    anyone who shed a tear for an eight-year-old boy who died waiting to see his Daddy finish a race should be reminded that eight-year-olds die all the time while we fucking dick around about gun violence

    Indeed. And I'm glad to see that no one is pointing out how the same writers in our major newspapers who compassionately shed tears over this eight-year-old boy have the driest of eyes when typing phrases like collateral damage or enhanced interrogation techniques. Why, it's almost as if some children matter more than others.

    ReplyDelete
  3. And excusing any of it is a political act.

    Me, I'll be satisfied if there's a closet in Hell somewhere where Chuck Todd gets to say "The President did not use the word 'Terrorism'" over and over, for Eternity, while he watches his paycheck shrink.


    I'll be satisfied when people who call themselves liberals stop excusing our President for things like this.

    P.S. Note for Charles Pierce: Telling people to grow up (aka, shut up and lick boots) IS excusing things like that.
    ~

    ReplyDelete
  4. Our president bombs weddings and funerals, by remote control. Who is he, or we, to complain about bombings and terrorism?

    ReplyDelete
  5. The Republicans and NRA fought and won against putting markers in fertilizer and gun powder. With these markers it could be determined by who and when they were made. It seems the Republicans and the NRA are unseating the ACLU on some of these issues.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Well said, Mr. Doghouse.

    ReplyDelete