tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11211639.post113082620183986540..comments2024-02-21T12:11:32.886-05:00Comments on Bats Left/Throws Right: "Strip Search Sam"James Briggs Stratton "Doghouse" Rileyhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05378802364709433791noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11211639.post-1131064322812308662005-11-03T19:32:00.000-05:002005-11-03T19:32:00.000-05:00Damn straight, jaye.I think any judge who feels th...Damn straight, jaye.<BR/>I think any judge who feels that a corporation has a more Constitutionally sound personal right to privacy than gays and women do is a serious mistake.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11211639.post-1130868118175063542005-11-01T13:01:00.000-05:002005-11-01T13:01:00.000-05:00Really, as I am just bar exam results away from be...Really, as I am just bar exam results away from being a lawyer -- I don't really think that Roe is about the Constitution or privacy or anything like that. It is about control. It is about the government telling women that they must be pregnant or if they have the guts to do something about an unwanted pregnancy, they can bleed to death for all the law cares.<BR/><BR/>Now, you want a solid in Jaye Ramsey Sutterhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05866341038412407027noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-11211639.post-1130857943943108132005-11-01T10:12:00.000-05:002005-11-01T10:12:00.000-05:00Your arguments are very compelling and I am in agr...Your arguments are very compelling and I am in agreement to a point. I believe that Roe is a strict constructionist and original intent position. As I understand the Constitution, the Ninth Amendment clearly speaks to the Founding Fathers' intentions to provide expansive rights and the document itself is, in every way, intended to limit the powers of government. In addition, abortion was legalDBKhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/08182965443810437028noreply@blogger.com