Friday, March 4

Uncut

Yosef (Still the Hottest Young Conservative Writer on the Nets) has objected to my recent outing at World O'Crap. I am not going to be drawn into the controversy, for the sake of my family, plus, I suspect it's all a ploy to get me to publish naked pictures of myself.

Besides, there's a 50K limit on photos.

8 comments:

Yosef said...

I'm just looking out for you. s.z. probably read your "Why I'm a Republican" post and thought she could take you down. But she didn't even wait for your WH correspondent credentials to come in.

Anonymous said...

Doghouse, judging from the 'head shot' (pardon my French!) your nudie shots would be hot! hot!! hot!!! Please make sure you keep the hat, pipe and stubble in frame.
VKW

Chris Vosburg said...

Briggs? Stratton? Come on, Riley, you're 4-strokin' us.

julia said...

I can't believe you knew Dagmar.

How cool is that.

doghouse riley said...

Well, the encounter was far too brief, but with the age difference it never would have worked out anyway.

Alex said...

Sexpots were terrifying creatures back then. I can understand your distaste for parades.

By the way... Doghouse Riley, that's a funny kind of name. What are you, a prizefighter?

Thorlac said...

Regarding Dagmar, what does potted sex look like? I've seen potted ham and even been called a shitpot, however, I am unable to come up a visual for sexpottery. I have similar difficulty with the term "fuckwad". Perhaps someone here can help me?

doghouse riley said...

I dunno, thorlac. When I was in high school, which was in the 70s, not the 50s, despite what anyone thinks, a girl wrote me a mash note, delivered by her friend, of course, which included the information that she was "not a sexpot". It was the pure anachronistic joy at the term, and not her charmingly naive assumption that this would somehow persuade me to act like a gentleman, which caused me to laugh out loud, which is why I shouldn't have read the thing in Physics class. And the term has stuck with me ever since.